According to the principles behind damages as a remedy, they are intended for which purposes?

The purpose of damages as a remedy in legal contexts primarily revolves around three key concepts: compensation, vindication, and deterrence.

Compensation is aimed at making the injured party whole or restoring them to the position they would have been in had the harm not occurred. This means calculating damages based on the losses suffered, whether they are economic (like lost wages or medical expenses) or non-economic (like pain and suffering).

Vindication refers to the idea that the legal system recognizes the right of the injured party and affirms that they have been wronged. This notion helps to restore the individual's sense of justice and may be particularly significant in tort law or cases of a discriminatory nature, for example.

Deterrence functions to discourage similar wrongful conduct in the future by imposing financial penalties on the party at fault. Knowing that a monetary judgment can result from harmful actions may compel individuals or entities to act more cautiously in their behavior to avoid similar situations that could lead to litigation.

While discouraging future legal action, promoting state interests, and providing public apologies can be relevant in specific legal contexts, they do not capture the fundamental objectives of damages as effectively as the concepts of compensation, vindication, and deterrence do.