In the case of Blencoe, which claim was made regarding the infringement of section 7?

The claim made regarding the infringement of section 7 in the Blencoe case centered on the argument that the process was excessively lengthy. Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the right to life, liberty, and security of the person, and it protects individuals from a wide range of state actions that could affect their rights. In the Blencoe case, the applicant argued that the prolonged duration of the administrative proceedings constituted an infringement of their right to security of the person.

This argument was based on the premise that the excessive length of the process led to significant stress and anxiety, undermining the individual's security and potentially impacting their liberty. The courts have recognized that unreasonable delays in legal proceedings can deny individuals the substance of their rights safeguarded under section 7. Thus, highlighting the length of the process was crucial in establishing the basis of the infringement claim.

In contrast, the other options reflect issues related to due process, penalties, or the fairness of the trial, but they were not the primary focus of the claim made in Blencoe regarding section 7. The case emphasizes the importance of timely legal proceedings as a fundamental aspect of protecting individual rights under the constitution.