What argument was raised in Canada v Bedford regarding prostitution laws?

In Canada v Bedford, the main argument focused on the assertion that the prostitution laws were unconstitutional and exploited vulnerable women. The Supreme Court of Canada found that certain provisions of the Criminal Code related to prostitution infringed on the rights of sex workers. The Court recognized that these laws not only marginalized those involved in sex work but also prevented them from taking necessary measures to protect their safety.

The ruling emphasized that the laws created a situation where women who engaged in prostitution were made more vulnerable to violence and exploitation, thus arguing that the laws did not serve the intended public purpose of protecting women. Instead, they exacerbated the risks faced by those involved in sex work. This decision highlighted the need for a legal framework that respects the rights and safety of sex workers rather than one that pushes them further into the shadows of illegality and danger.

This perspective contrasts with other options. While some may argue about interference with privacy rights or the promotion of criminality, the core of the Bedford case was centered on the impact of these laws on the personal safety and constitutional rights of vulnerable individuals engaged in sex work. The ruling led to significant discussions and changes in the legal landscape surrounding sex work in Canada.