What does the reading in remedy involve?

The concept of "reading in" as a remedial approach in constitutional law primarily involves interpreting existing legislation in a way that is consistent with constitutional requirements. This means that if a law is found to be inconsistent with the Constitution, the courts may choose to modify the interpretation of the law rather than striking it down entirely.

When a court employs the "reading in" remedy, it allows for the addition of necessary provisions to a statute to ensure that it aligns with constitutional norms, without actually altering the text of the statute itself. This approach allows the law to be applied in a constitutional manner while maintaining its overall structure.

For instance, if a particular law discriminates against a group in violation of equality rights as guaranteed by the Constitution, the court may read in additional terms to the law that would make it compliant, effectively expanding its provisions to ensure fairness and inclusivity.

Though other options might suggest various forms of legal modification or interpretation, "reading in" specifically refers to enhancing existing statutes to comply with constitutional mandates, which is why adding provisions is the best characterization of this legal remedy.