What does the subjective test in Syndicat Northwest v Amselem measure?

The subjective test in Syndicat Northwest v Amselem is focused on measuring the sincerity of an individual's belief in a practice. This case is pivotal in interpreting religious freedom under Section 2(a) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Supreme Court emphasized that the objective of the Charter is to protect individuals' rights to hold and express beliefs that are sincerely held, even if those beliefs may not align with mainstream understandings or practices.

By assessing the sincerity of belief, the court recognizes the deeply personal nature of faith and the importance of actual conviction in the expression of religious practices. The implications of this test go beyond mere adherence to specific rituals or communal activities; it instead centers on the individual's inner commitment and how that commitment affects their right to practice their religion freely.

Other options, such as the financial implications of the practice, location, or number of supporters, do not directly relate to the fundamental aspects of religious freedom that the courts are tasked with protecting. These factors might contribute to the overall context of a case but do not measure the authenticity of belief itself, which is central to the subjective test established by this decision.