What is a potential result of using Reading Down in legislative interpretation?

The choice indicating that a law is clarified to remain valid within the powers of the legislature accurately reflects the principle of reading down in legislative interpretation. This practice occurs when a court interprets a statute in a limited sense, allowing the law to stay within the jurisdictional boundaries set by the relevant constitutional framework. Rather than invalidating or disregarding the law, reading down suggests a formulation of the statute's provisions that aligns with constitutional requirements, thus preserving its validity.

Reading down is typically employed when a law is potentially unconstitutional as written, often because it might overreach beyond the intended legislative powers. By interpreting the statute in a more constrained manner, the judiciary can ensure that the law operates effectively and remains legally sound, avoiding the need for judicial invalidation. This approach serves to balance legislative intent with constitutional compliance, demonstrating respect for the principle of parliamentary sovereignty while also safeguarding against overreach.