What is meant by 'Minimum Impairment' in the Proportionality Test?

In the context of constitutional law, 'Minimum Impairment' is a crucial component of the Proportionality Test, which is applied when assessing whether a law that infringes on a right can be justified under certain circumstances. This principle specifically emphasizes that any restriction imposed by a law on a constitutional right should be the least restrictive means necessary to achieve a legitimate objective.

The reasoning behind this concept is rooted in the idea that rights and freedoms are fundamental, and any limitations on these rights must be carefully scrutinized. The 'Minimum Impairment' criterion ensures that when a government seeks to limit a right, it must do so in a way that is as minimal as possible while still addressing the relevant issue. This means exploring if there are alternative means to achieve the same goal without infringing upon the rights of individuals as significantly.

This principle serves as a safeguard against overly broad or draconian measures that would disproportionately affect individual rights. It requires lawmakers and courts to examine whether the law in question is tailored appropriately and if less intrusive options have been considered and rejected before resorting to restrictions.

The other options incorrectly convey different notions about rights and laws. Some suggest a permissiveness in legal restrictions, while others imply an absolute protection of rights or that all