What is the principle behind severance in legal remedies?

Prepare for the NCA Canadian Constitutional Law Exam with a range of engaging tools. This quiz features flashcards and multiple choice questions complete with hints and explanations. Boost your confidence and ready yourself for success!

The principle of severance in legal remedies allows for the invalidation of only the specific portion of a statute that is deemed unconstitutional, while leaving the remainder of the statute intact. This approach is based on the idea that if a particular provision violates constitutional principles, it can be removed without necessarily affecting the entire legislative framework. This ensures that valid laws can continue to operate and serve their intended purpose, promoting stability and continuity within the legal system.

This principle embodies the notion of judicial restraint, where courts strive to preserve legislative intent and the effective functioning of laws to the greatest extent possible. The other choices regarding invalidating all parts of a statute, striking down only valid sections, or requiring entire statutes to be reenacted do not align with this judicial philosophy, as they would undermine the utility of severance in preserving viable legal provisions. Thus, only the unconstitutional or invalid section is removed to allow the legislative intent behind the remaining parts to remain in force.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy