What outcome typically results from applying the Colourability Doctrine?

The Colourability Doctrine is a principle often applied in constitutional law to assess the true intent behind a legislative enactment. When applying this doctrine, courts look beyond the surface of a law to investigate whether its purpose or effects align with the jurisdiction's powers as outlined in the constitution.

When a law has a disguised purpose that does not fit within the constitutional powers of the enacting body, the Colourability Doctrine can reveal this underlying intent. This analysis aims to prevent legislative bodies from circumventing constitutional limits by masking the true purpose of their laws under seemingly legitimate terms. If a law is found to be enacted under pretense to exert authority that does not belong to the legislative body, it can lead to the law's invalidation.

This process reinforces the accountability of legislative bodies, ensuring that they operate within their jurisdictional limits. Thus, recognizing a law's concealed motivations through the Colourability Doctrine is crucial for upholding the integrity of constitutional governance.