What power does the Supreme Court have under the Unanimity amending procedure?

The Supreme Court has a significant role in interpreting the law and ensuring the Constitution is upheld. Under the Unanimity amending procedure, which is outlined in the Constitution Act, 1982, certain constitutional amendments require the consent of all provincial legislatures and the federal government. This includes changes that affect the composition of the Supreme Court, such as eligibility requirements for its judges.

The ability of the Supreme Court to influence or play a role in determining the eligibility for judges is tied to its function as the guardian of the Constitution. The Court may interpret provisions related to the qualifications and appointments of its members, ensuring that any amendments or actions taken concerning these matters remain consistent with the constitutional framework.

Other choices do not pertain to the specific powers granted to the Supreme Court under the Unanimity amending procedure. Creating new laws typically falls under the legislative branch, while the appointment of provincial court judges is the responsibility of provincial governments. Nullifying existing laws is a function of judicial review, but not directly a power exercised specifically under the Unanimity procedure itself. Hence, the Supreme Court’s interpretation of eligibility for its judges aligns correctly with the context of the question.