What principle does Content Neutrality uphold in R v Butler?

The principle of Content Neutrality in the context of R v Butler reinforces that the content of expression should not be the sole factor in determining whether that expression is protected under Section 2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This principle underscores that freedom of expression is essential in a democratic society, and any legislative restrictions must be based on the act of expression itself rather than the actual content or viewpoints being expressed.

In R v Butler, the Supreme Court of Canada dealt with issues surrounding obscenity and the regulation of sexually explicit materials. The Court emphasized that the mere offensiveness of certain types of expression does not justify limiting freedom of expression. This decision illustrates that regulations aimed at content must be carefully scrutinized to avoid infringing on rights guaranteed under Section 2.

The other options stem from misunderstandings of the principle of Content Neutrality. The content of statements being disregarded if offensive undermines the protection that such expression may deserve. Suggesting that only public officials can regulate content fails to acknowledge the critical role that private individuals and society as a whole play in dialogue and the discursive nature of free expression. Lastly, the notion that all expression must be socially acceptable misunderstands the fundamental role of freedom of expression, which includes the protection of unconventional or