What was the main argument in the case of Law v Canada regarding age discrimination?

The primary argument in the case of Law v Canada revolved around the violation of section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which guarantees equality before the law and the right to equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination. In this case, the appellant contended that the age requirement for certain benefits was discriminatory and unjustly limited the rights of individuals based on their age. This aligns with the principles of equality and non-discrimination that section 15 seeks to uphold.

The court's analysis focused on whether the provision in question created a differential impact on individuals based on age and whether that impact could be justified under the law. The ruling emphasized the importance of safeguarding the rights of minorities and promoting equal treatment for all individuals, thereby solidifying the role of section 15 as a crucial part of Canadian constitutional law regarding discrimination based on various grounds, including age.

Understanding this case is fundamental, as it reinforces the principle that laws must be applied without discrimination and that individuals should receive equal access and benefits regardless of their age.