Which case indicates the valid exercise of general trade and commerce power?

The correct answer highlights the case "General Motors v City National Leasing" as indicating a valid exercise of the general trade and commerce power. This case reflects the Supreme Court of Canada's interpretation of the trade and commerce power as laid out in Section 91(2) of the Constitution Act, 1867.

In "General Motors v City National Leasing," the Court examined the extent to which the federal government can legislate concerning matters that may be deemed to fall within the scope of trade and commerce. The ruling established that the federal government has the authority to regulate not only interprovincial activities but also aspects of commerce that are considered to impact the economy as a whole. This case is particularly significant because it affirms the ability to legislate broadly in areas impacting trade between provinces, emphasizing the importance of ensuring a cohesive national market.

Understanding this distinction is crucial for discerning the application of the trade and commerce power in Canada, especially as it relates to the balance of federal and provincial jurisdictions. The ruling in this case has had lasting implications on how trade laws are framed and enforced, showcasing the flexibility of federal powers in the Canadian constitutional landscape.

Other cases listed do relate to trade and commerce issues, but they either do not address the general power as